Because it allowances players. Take Tomb Raider 2013 for example, it's apparently appealing harder to acquisition a abounding bout on PS3 or 360. But if we had cross-play, you'd apparently accept no issues award NBA Live Mobile Coins one.
I know, the bold had abhorrent multiplayer and the association is apparently all but dead, but it's just an archetype of the account of crossplay because if it had crossplay, conceivably the association ability still be alive, it would apparently be a baby one, but still.
There are no negatives to it. More options are consistently better, Sony abstinent it or captivation aback from it's users is not a acceptable affair and absolutely not 4theplayers.
It's anti-consumer. Just like not acceptance EA access, let the users decide, accepting it accessible as an advantage takes no amount abroad from players.
5 dolla a NBA Live Mobile Coins ages you can play all these STELLAR titles like NBA Live 18 and even NBA Live 17 WHO and if you fell like accomplishing something abroad you can consistently accompany the 4000 players larboard on Battlefield Hardline.
I am DENYING IT ! Because for me it's not a accord at all. i dont play any sports amateur and the blow does not absorption me at all, aswell I debris to pay for amateur as a Monty fee.
I'm not activity EA Access. Mostly because its EA. Only affair I'd apparently play is Dragon Age Inquisition, but I already own a Buy NBA Live Coins harder copy.